I sent a veteran
buddy of mine a piece on an official military honor guard joining
a Gay Pride march in Washington DC. His reaction:
Fantastic, unbelievable there is a feeling of respect in the gay
community
which I originally relayed about gay veterans. I will always say the
stereo-type does not
always fit reality. Like I said before it's not always about pink
poodles
No, it's not. Pink
poodles are certainly part of the gay image, but no, they became a
focus because people outside of, and in many cases, people who were
hostile to, the LGBT community, made that the gay image.
That exchange
reminded me of a book I read back in junior high (Nowadays called
middle school). It was about the struggle between Northern and
Southern Italians. The Northerners were exploiting the South by
extractng their resources, largely farm produce. Southerners launched
a rebellion in the 1800s. Northern Italians in Rome sought to
understand what was going on and looked around to speak with the only
Southern Italians they knew, the aristocrats who collaborated with
the North to send food from the South to the North. Naturally,
because it was hardly in their interests to truly illuminate how the
situation was so bad for Southern Italians in general, the Southern
Italian aristocrats gave the Northerners bad advice and the situation
got worse.
It's important then,
for countries and cultures to have at least works of art to act as
ambassadors to the culture that's in a dominant position. I've seen a
number of works that have done this. I paid attention to the
struggles in Central America that came to my attention as a college
student in the late 70s, with conflicts in El Salvador and Nicaragua.
But it wasn't until the comic book Love
& Rockets was put out that I had more than a one-dimensional
image of the larger Latino community as doing and being more than
just fighting, dying and cursing the gringo. Reading it gave me a
more complex picture, one that emphasized both the differences and
similarities between them and us white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants, both
the things that made us all human and the things that made our groups
distinct from each other.
What was the first
artistic ambassador that explained one world to another? My guess
would be Uncle
Tom's Cabin. It described a society and a way of life that
Northerners lived next to, but most of them had no personal
experience of. As the University
of Virginia concedes, Harriet Beecher Stowe drew an essentially
accurate portrait of what it was like to be a slave in the South. The
minstrels of the era tried very hard to present their own version of
slavery as a benign institution, but their efforts didn't make much
headway.
During the Iraq War,
an educated young Iraqi woman who named herself River
wrote a blog that captured the imaginations of at least the people
who opposed the war there. In 2013, she added a post taking a look
back. Her writings emphasized both how different the Iraqi culture
was (She generally didn't like Saddam Hussein, didn't wear one
herself, but was well-disposed towards wearing the hijab, was
strongly opposed to the American invasion and documented how it hurt
the Iraqi people) and, by adding lots of personal touches and
mentions of people she knew (Always as pseudonyms), emphasized the
common humanity of Iraqis and Americans.
Probably the most
well-known comic that did the same thing for the gay community was
Desert
Peach. Pfirsch (Peach) Rommel was General Erwin Rommel's
fictional gay younger brother, a colonel who was in command of the
“469th Half-Track and Grave-Digging Battalion” that
generally stayed in the background of the war in Northern Africa from
1941 to 1943. And yes, like the real-life Erwin Rommel, Pfirsch was a
complex character who tried to do the best he could in a situation
that didn't allow for a whole lot of humanity or decency.
A fellow straight
person commented on Facebook on how much he appreciated the TV show
Will &
Grace that ran from 1998 to 2006. A gay person replied on how
that was a show that he never paid much attention to. He regarded it
as a bit of fluff that had nothing important to say. I agreed that it
probably had little to say to gays themselves, but thought and still
think that the show provided a good introduction to gay life for
straights. Jack sort of, kind of resembled the old stereotypes, but
Will most certainly didn't. I can see Jack walking a pink poodle, at
least in his much younger days. Can't see it for Will at all. The
effect of that is to assure people that the stereotype is not
entirely wrong, it's at least based on truth, but that it's a
terribly cramped and limited way of viewing gay people.
Making contact with
a larger, dominant culture can be a very useful thing for a less
dominant culture to do and no, it's not necessary for members of the
less dominant culture to say to themselves “Someone else is doing
the cultural outreach, so I don't have to.” You never know what
exactly will spark the interest of people in the dominant culture, so
it's best to take an "all hands on deck" or "full court press" approach, to just try everything.